It is said that history does not repeat itself, but that there are analogies, as demonstrated by the reactions to Minister Jean Boulet’s bill to regulate child labor.

It should be remembered that there are many theses, articles and studies on the history of education in Quebec and its links with child labor. They illustrate the fierce battles that took place between, on the one hand, the Catholic Church and conservative circles, and, on the other hand, liberals, labor movements and women’s movements. A Jesuit will even go so far as to write that if everyone is educated, there will be a shortage of scavengers and labourers.

Suffice it to recall that the Quebec Compulsory Education Act only dates back to 1943, when the province of Quebec was the last to adopt such a legislative instrument. The law applied to children aged 6 to 14 and education was to be free.

Senator Raoul Dandurand, who was a staunch defender of compulsory education, was appointed in 1909 as chairman of a commission of inquiry into the operation of the Montreal Catholic School Board. His report not having received much support, and faced with the stubborn refusal of the clergy who feared that their influence on the organization of education would be diminished, the government of Lomer Gouin (1905-1920) had a law adopted in 1919 which forbade any person directing an industry, a trade, or exercising a trade, a profession, from employing boys and girls under the age of 16 unless they could read and write fluently.

Dandurand, marked by the defeat of his father-in-law Félix-Gabriel Marchand, Premier of Quebec from 1897 to 1900, who had unsuccessfully attempted to establish a Ministry of Public Instruction, stated in a lecture in 1918: “La question of education should take precedence over all others in our thinking. It is on her that the future of our little people depends, as it does of all other nations. Let us not look elsewhere for our salvation: it is at school that we must prepare it. »

He also said that if children did not stay in school long enough, they risked not having the basics necessary to return there as adults.

So let’s think seriously before expanding children’s access to the labor market too much.